Despite failure of censorship motions of RN and LFI, NUPPES holds good

After last week’s divergences on the fact of accepting or not of the Voices of the RN on left -wing motions, the deputies of the Nuts were mainly grouped on Monday, behind the text carried by the rebellious France.

by and

The fourth and fifth motions of censorship deposited in less than a week against the government therefore did not succeed. Monday, October 31, that of the deputies of the National Rally (RN) collected 90 votes, that of those of La France Insoumise (LFI) 218, below the 289 required. In the absence of the votes of the Republicans (LR), these attempts to reply with the procedure of 49.3 engaged on the draft social security budget on Wednesday by Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne, seemed in vain. The social security financing bill was therefore adopted at first reading after the rejection of these two censorship motions.

Otherwise, the texts carried by the RN and LFI have made it possible to replay this duel which has settled since the beginning of the five -year term: that opposing the reborn macronist party to LFI, finally sparing the national rally and placing the right as a legitimate ally of the government. “Ladies and Gentlemen of the deputies of rebellious France, the new union of populisms does not build an alternative majority, Tuncued Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne on Monday. [Your censorship motion] It is ultimately the deputy Olivier Faure who speaks the Better. And, I quote it, it’s hubbub. “

The first secretary of the Socialist Party had, a few minutes before, explained the socialist reluctance as to the motion deposited by its allies of LFI within the new Ecological and Social People’s Union (NUPES). “To suggest every week that the government falls without ever being threatened, we take the risk of weakening the force of the message and the echo it must find in opinion,” he said , Before adding: “The risk taken is that of a continuous hubbub that will only benefit anti -apparatus.”

On the political strategy, the nuances are clear

The subtext of the session was therefore the solidity of the alliance of the Nuts at a time when rebellious France had signed this third motion on the left alone. Besides Olivier Faure, everyone explained. For environmentalists, the deputy of the Yvelines, Benjamin Lucas, argued: “Voting today the censorship proposed by our” rebellious “colleagues, which we did not share the opportunity a priori, is to demand another method from you . “As for the communist speaker Sébastien Jumel, he defended a” serene “vote:” we do not wonder every morning how and under what circumstances will fall the government, “he said, considering that There was “there was nothing to gain in hysterizing the debate”.

You have 51.66% of this article to read. The continuation is reserved for subscribers.

/Media reports.