La France Insoumise invites the extreme right to vote for its censure motion against the government, after a first vote in common on Monday. An approach to which the other members of the left alliance are opposed.
by
What magnitude does the new Ecological and Social People’s Popular Union (Nuts) trembled after the vote of his censorship motion on Monday, October 24, by the National Rally (RN)? This week, the emotion crossed the union of the left, with, on the one hand, “rebellious” congratulating itself with having jostled the government to “only 50 votes” of the absolute majority, and, of the Other, environmentalists, communists and socialists embarrassed to have attracted the votes of the far right.
In a few days, the clip will be put to the test again. Thursday, October 27, Jean-Luc Mélenchon repeated at 8 p.m. in France 2 that he dreamed of bringing the government to fall and provoking new legislative elections. “With the Nuts, we are ready to govern, to change the lives of people,” confirmed the founder of rebellious France (LFI). In the wake of the third 49.3 of the executive on the social security budget on Wednesday, LFI will therefore deposit a new censorship motion.
“We take all those who want to join this motion”, confirmed “the rebellious” Eric Coquerel, president of the finance committee in the National Assembly. Once again, there is no question of doing without the voices of the far right, even if it finally announced Thursday at the end of the day that it would present its own motion.
“Station to the motions that would express an opposition of operetta. It is intended to be voted by all the deputies (including elected representatives or macronists in crisis …)”, had warned the LFI deputy of Seine earlier -Saint-Denis Alexis Corbière, who intends to write a “Tribunician” text. And use your speaking time to “denounce the brutalization” of the Parliament.
a simple “tactical micro-divergence”
In this yardstick, the text will therefore not include a poisoned pill, which would prevent RN deputies from dubbing it. This time, LFI will play its solo part. Neither the Communist Party (PC), nor the environmentalists, nor the Socialist Party (PS) wished to join this initiative. Unlike melenchonists, they do not want to “systematize” the use of this tool. “Especially since we have already had the opportunity to express ourselves on this bill” Social Security financing (PLFSS), justifies PS deputy Arthur Delaporte. “This can be counterproductive,” corroborates the communist deputy Pierre Dharréville. Same analysis for the president of the environmental group, Cyrielle Chatelain, who considers that the debate on the PLFSS has “already taken place”.
You have 61.67% of this article to read. The continuation is reserved for subscribers.