Scientists Actively Reflect on Transferring Consciousness to Computer
Scientists are actively engaged in reflecting on the concept of transferring consciousness to a computer, based on three key assumptions. This idea originated within the framework of the transhumanism movement and has gained support from renowned scientists including inventor and futurologist Ray Kurzweil, philosopher Nick Bostrom, and neuroscientist Randal Cohen.
The first assumption is that the technology to transfer consciousness will be developed in the coming decades. Currently, scientists have only managed to recreate the most complex neural connections in the brain larvae of the crusophyla. However, the human brain is significantly more intricate, which raises doubts about the speed of developing such a technology.
The second assumption revolves around whether simulating the brain can generate a genuine mind. Some scientists believe that the intricate neural connections are the key to creating consciousness, regardless of its physical nature.
The third assumption tackles the question of whether a digital copy of the brain can be considered the real “you”. Philosophers are divided into two camps: some argue that biological continuity plays a crucial role, while others believe that consciousness and personality are determined by mental processes and memories.
The problem becomes more complex when considering that the original biological “I” will also continue to exist after the transfer. In this scenario, the question emerges: which of the two will be the true “you”?
Thus, the transfer of consciousness to a computer remains a subject of heated debates and speculation. Despite technological progress, this process still requires a leap of faith, and the final answer to the question of whether consciousness can be transferred remains uncertain.