Dinosaurs’ Intellect: Smarter Than Baboons?

In recent times, paleontologists have made significant progress in understanding how dinosaurs perceived the world and interacted with their environment during the Cretaceous period. New technologies and discoveries are shedding light on the behaviors and cognitive abilities of these ancient creatures.

One of the most iconic predators of that era was the Tyrannosaurus Rex, commonly portrayed in books and movies as hunting herbivorous dinosaurs like the Triceratops. However, questions remain about how accurate these depictions are. Did T. Rex possess keen senses, advanced vision, and complex planning skills, or was its behavior more instinctual?

Since the early 19th century, debates have centered around the brain size and sensory capabilities of dinosaurs. Initial studies suggested that dinosaurs had limited intellectual abilities due to their small brains. For example, some believed that the Stegosaurus had a second “brain” in its pelvis to compensate for its small skull brain. However, modern research has shown that this structure likely served a different purpose, similar to modern birds.

Advancements in technology, such as microcomputer tomography, have enabled scientists to reconstruct the brain volume and structure of dinosaurs with greater precision. This information provides valuable insights into how ancient predators utilized their sensory organs and navigated their surroundings.

A recent study by neurobiologist Susana Herkula-Hoosel from The University of Wanderbilt has sparked intrigue by suggesting that T. Rex may have been as intelligent as a baboon. Utilizing a novel method developed by Herkula-Hoosel and Roberto Ratto, scientists estimate that T. Rex could have had around three billion neurons, comparable to primates. However, there are caveats to consider.

Firstly, the calculation of neuron numbers is based on certain assumptions, such as the entirety of the brain box being filled with brain tissue. Yet, research indicates that in dinosaurs, a substantial portion of this space might have been occupied by other structures like sinuses and blood vessels, potentially leading to a smaller actual brain volume than expected.

/Reports, release notes, official announcements.