Several facts “capable of constituting crimes or serious health or research breaches” are noted in an inspection report, which draws up a disastrous management of the management practiced by the infectiologist, former director of the ‘Institut.
by
The Institute Hospital-University Mediterranean infection (IHU-MI), directed until mid-July by Professor Didier Raoult, is again in turmoil. The public prosecutor was seized by the Minister of Health, François Braun, and the Minister of Higher Education and Research, Sylvie Retailleau, for facts “likely to constitute crimes or serious shortcomings to regulations In terms of health or research “, according to A common press release published Monday September 5.
The prosecutor of Marseille Dominique Laurens indicated the same evening to the agency France-Presse having opened a judicial information. The decision follows the publication on Monday of an inspection report of the two ministries (Igas and Igesr) uncovering “serious dysfunctions of Ihu-Mi concerning the quality of its research and care activities”.
The new director of the Institute, very linked to Didier Raoult, Pierre-Edouard Fournier, and his seven founding members (including the Aix-Marseille University, the public assistance-hopitals in Marseille, the Institute of Research For the development or health service of the armies) will soon be summoned by their guardianships to “implement as soon as possible a proactive action plan” which “will condition the continuation of the activity of IHU-MI and Its funding by the State “, according to the common press release from ministers.
” Derivation of governance “
Another complaint had been filed in April by the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) for “serious breaches” and procedures “not in accordance with the regulation of research involving the human person ( Riph), especially ethically “. But the work of Igas and Igesr inspectors goes further than that of the ANSM, since, in addition to the numerous differences in the ethical rules noted, it is interested, over the period 2017-2021, in governance Ihu-Mi, its working conditions or its strategy. In addition to 150 pages, a particularly negative assessment of Didier Raoult and “his” IHU, created in 2011, is drawn: “drift of governance”, “management mode generating malaise at work”, “strategy at Re -examine “,” deviant medical and scientific practices “… The report also questions the quality of scientific production, one of the pride of its former director, noting that the Marseille institute produces more research articles in REVIEWS OF LIKE INFORM that the other IHU.
You have 48.16% of this article to read. The continuation is reserved for subscribers.