The executive intended to take advantage of the LOPMI law to introduce new provisions on immigration. But the results of the legislative elections, which only gave Emmanuel Macron that a majority relating to the National Assembly, rebuild the cards.
by
Everything is called into question. Everything is on stand-by. At the Ministry of the Interior, while the entourage of Gérald Darmanin had announced floor on a text of immigration law, in the aftermath of the presidential election, the result of the legislative elections questioned the dynamics. “We were asked to prepare a text three weeks ago and we were finally told that there were no more, given the context in the National Assembly,” reported, at the end of June, a senior official of the Place Beauvau.
The government was counting on the Department of Interior Orientation and Programming Bill (LOPMI) – supposed to lead into the hemicycle before the end of the year – to introduce legislative immigration provisions .
If the first mandate of the Head of State was the occasion of a thematic law, the asylum and immigration law, called “Collomb law”, and a series of additional measures after the ” Debate “organized in the National Assembly, at the end of 2019, Emmanuel Macron did not go to the end of his reforming will.
“The problem is always the capacity for renewed, believes a prefect. In the population, it is a concern.” “When you see the extreme right that rises, you ask yourself questions, abounds a Former executive of the general management of foreigners in France. We have a code for the entry and stay of very protective foreigners and low referral rates. We need more effective distance measures. “
Work tracks
The Head of State had listed some promises during his campaign, including the strengthening of the means to remove foreigners dismissed from their asylum request, so that “the refusal of asylum will be worth the obligation to leave the French territory [OQTF] “, or the reform of the litigation of foreigners, to fight against” the multiplication of remedies “.
The assessment of Gérald Darmanin in the matter did not give full satisfaction, despite the minister’s displayed voluntarism. “He managed to have their countries of origin take up the people who are feared at the FSPRT [File of reports for the prevention of radicalization of a terrorist nature], but, on people with disturbances to public order, the machine distance has gripped “, analyzes an advisor to Matignon. In question: the limitation of displacements due to the pandemic and the semi -inted results of the strategy consisting in depriving visas of countries – in particular Algeria and Morocco – refractory to resume their nationals in an irregular situation.
You have 54.42% of this article to read. The continuation is reserved for subscribers.