The national anti-terrorist prosecution requested the incompressible perpetuity against Salah Abdeslam and sentences ranging from five years to life against the nineteen other accused, Friday, at the end of three days of an indictment that will be date. p>
by and
“Dread is to get out of peace. It is the disappearance of the curtain behind which the nothingness hides, curtain which normally allows to live quiet. This curtain is irreparably torn apart, and we know So forever that nothingness, death, exists. Terrorism is impossible tranquility. Your verdict will not have the virtue of repairing this torn curtain and making their tranquility to the victims. He will not cure wounds , visible or invisible, it will not bring the dead back to life. But he can at least assure them that it is, here, justice and the right that have the last word. “
Camille Hennetier is reassured. At the end of an indictment that will be a date, pronounced in three votes from Wednesday 8 to Friday June 10, she has just asked on behalf of the National Anti -terrorist prosecution (PNAT) which she embodies with Nicolas Braconnay and Nicolas Le Bris, of the penalties going From five years in prison (Ali Oulkadi) to incompressible life (Salah Abdeslam) against the twenty accused of the trial of the attacks of November 13.
Perpetuity against all those in the box which, prosecuted as an accomplice or co -author of the killings, incurred it: the PNAT typed hard. Sentences opening the door to an upcoming release or convertible against the least involved: the PNAT has shown discernment. Place, from Monday, at the Defense pleadings. The Assize Court specially composed of Paris will return its verdict on June 29.
For three days, she attended a piece of legal bravery. Fifteen hours to summarize four and a half years of instruction and nine months of audience, to “rebuild the puzzle” of the deadliest attacks in the history of France, to establish responsibilities, dismantle the lies of some, admit doubts Regarding others, raking the slightest telephone demarcation, the slightest geolocation, the slightest declaration where guilt would nestle.
The file of November 13 and its million pages were too big for a simple indictment. It was therefore a fresco, immense and tragic. The testimonies of 400 civil parties heard at the hearing will constitute the most complete and eloquent story of the evening of November 13 and the sufferings it generated. On the architecture of these attacks, from their conception to their realization, the precision, the completeness and sobriety of Camille Hennetier, Nicolas Braconnay and Nicolas Le Bris will be the reference.
Beyond the methodical reconstruction of events, this indictment will remain marked by Camille Hennetier’s words on the impossible reintegration of certain accused. “When fanaticism has gangrenously ganged, the disease is almost incurable. What to answer for a man who tells you that he likes to obey God than men, and who, consequently, is sure to deserve the Heaven by slaughtering you? “To these words of Voltaire, she added hers:” It is difficult for our secularized society to apprehend the idea of an absolute faith, by which belief becomes an engine of destruction of the Another. The strength of this deadly ideology is such that nothing can shake it. I do not believe that a backtrack is possible, not for the moment anyway. “
You have 75.42% of this article to read. The continuation is reserved for subscribers.