During his interrogation before the Doubs Assize Court, Tuesday, the young Chilien denied his involvement in the assassination of Narumi Kurosaki, his former Japanese girlfriend, in December 2016 in Besançon, despite the ‘Accumulation of loads that weigh on it.
by
The interrogation of Nicolas Zepeda had just started, Tuesday, April 5, which already had to be resigned: we can not know how Narumi Kurosaki was killed, in room 106 of the student residence of Besançon, the night From 4 to 5 December 2016, nor where his body was concealed.
– Do you see thirteen times on the images of video surveillance of the residence?
– No, it’s not me, Mr. Chairman.
– Is it you who have been seen twice, by two students, hidden in the kitchen of this residence?
– I’m not that person.
Nicolas Zepeda is not “this person” morporable jealous, obsessed for weeks by the rupture that his former Japanese girlfriend had imposed on him, entering his messaging, controlling the photos of his male friends on his Wall Facebook, stubbornly trading the proofs of his registered freedom and his new love happiness. It is not “this person”, stuck in the distress and the injury of pride, who secretly prepares a journey from Santiago de Chile to Besançon, buys upon his arrival a bond of five liters of flammable liquid, matches and A detergent, spy for three nights and two days the window of the student’s 106 room, invites him to dinner, makes it disappear, and usurpe in the days following his IP addresses on social networks to try to reassure all Those who are worried about the absence of the young woman before returning to her country.
No, the young man, coming from a Catholic Chilean and easy, elder, and only boy of a sibling of three, son spoiled by his mother and heir designated from his father’s professional success, can not to be this person, guilty of murdered Narumi Kurosaki.
Once, only one, Nicolas Zepeda feathered
The vertiginous accumulation of evidence, in images, in testimonials, in telephone, computer expertise, in thousands of messages exhumed, in the irrefutable overlap of all these data, facing parents who, from the first suspicions, have Built a fortress around their son? Who appealed to one of the largest law firms in Santiago to ensure that, never, the young Chilean should be accountable to French justice? Which, when the unthinkable happened – his extradition to France and the prospect of appearing before a court of Assis – have chosen Jacqueline Laffont, one of the most famous lawyers in the Place de Paris, a council of a Former President of the Republic, to represent him? Who, before the opening of the trial have multiplied the interviews in the press to proclaim his innocence? Who, since Tuesday, March 29, are sitting at the forefront of the public, the eyes riveted at the accused’s box? And who, on Tuesday, April 5, have been authorized by President Matthieu Husson, having lunch and to talk to him, just before he was interviewed?
You have 39.76% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.