The Vice-President LRM of the National Assembly and co-founder in common, movement embodying the left majority wing, highlights his criticisms against the majority project as on the role of Parliament.
Le Monde with AFP
After five years of office as MPA Republic (LRM), Hugues Ranson puts forward “his doubts”. The National Meeting of the National Assembly announced, Wednesday, February 16, do not want to represent themselves in the next legislative, highlighting its criticisms against the majority project as on the role of Parliament.
Member of Parliament and co-founder in common, movement embodying the left wing of the majority, Mr. Renson says that his decision is “a political act murically reflected”. “It is both the fruit of a doubt about political recomposition and the progressive project such as I had considered them, of anxiety about the evolution of our parliamentary democracy, and an alert, too, on the excesses of Our politico-media system “, wrote on its website the co-founder in common.
This party, made up of about 40 LRM parliamentarians, is supported by the Minister of Ecology, Barbara Pompili. In the public debate, these elected officials highlight their differences on the social policy of the government. But in the group, many believe that in common “has no political weight”.
“Limits” of the parliamentary exercise
m. Renson, who is willing on the humanistic commitment of the former right president Jacques Chirac, in his capacity as Vice-President of the Bourbon Palace, leads many debates during the legislature but has found serious limits.
“The Parliament no longer works as it should. Wanted by its founders as balanced, half-presidential mid-parliamentary, our republic has drawn up the consequences or the establishment of the five-year, nor the inversion of the Electoral calendar that makes legislative replica of the presidential election, nor a personal and centralized practice of power at work since the 2000s, “he described.
“The National Assembly comes to be considered – and sometimes to consider themselves – as a decisions registration chamber elaborated elsewhere,” he said. “In debates, divergent voices and temperance have little space, between the ease of systematic opposition and the sclerosis of majority discipline,” he still raised.
m. Fension also the “political and media system in an impasse”, referring to both social networks and the television trays, where the “buzz and clash” reign. “The country needs a debate on options that open. It needs different, competitive and identified lines and political projects. Exceeding, it is not erasure. And the cleavages are not On the contrary, they are the sign of the vitality of our democracy, “he still observed while several right-wing political figures joined the majority camp.
“Islamo-Gauchism”, law on global security, state of emergency … Charritating a lot of debate, the year 2021 had already been marked by several disaffections within the Republic on the United States. Since 2017, the group, with 313 deputies initially, has seen some forty members leave it.