Three months of the presidential election, the debates on the bill transforming the vaccine passenger passes did not succeed and took a very political round.
by
Touched, therefore cast. Joint Joint Joint Committee (CMP) discussions between members and senators on the bill transforming the vaccineal passenger pass were torpedoed after four hours of debate … by a tweet. That of the Chairman of the Republicans in the Senate, Bruno Retail. While no agreement had been concluded, Thursday, January 13, Mr. ReTailleau, on the move in Vendée, announces on his Twitter account at 5:45 pm that the CMP “gave reason to the Senate”, acting “the victory of the good meaning “, and punctuating his message by a critic of the head of state:” The pass is intended to protect the French and nothing else … does not displease Emmanuel Macron. “
It was not necessary for the majority of the Assembly to declare the end of the talks leaving the closed session of the CMP, leaving senators more than decontencised. “We can not suspend work that was also close to an agreement on the basis of an external event,” denounced the text rapporteur in the Senate, Philippe Bas (LR, Channel).
Half an hour after the tweet, the serious mine, Yaël Braun-Pivet, the Chairman of the Law Commission at the Assembly, reacted in front of the cameras: “This intolerable damage to the functioning of our institutions and parliament We led us to the failure of this joint joint commission, so we suspended this work. “The administrators of the assembly had prepared a text acting the favorable outcome of the CMP.
Due to the expedited procedure, the review of the bill must resume on Friday at the National Assembly, then to the Senate on Saturday. Members will have the last word. “It is also possible to understand the attitude of the Chairman of the Assembly’s Laws Commission. It is a fault, a mistake on the part of Mr. ReTailleau,” said Socialist Senator of Loiret Jean-Pierre Sueur. Bruno Retaileau, he does not speak of fault, explaining that a collaborator “made the tweet leave” too early: “How can a tweet call into question an agreement on this important question? Where is the interest General here? How would the Parliament rights be violated? The majority takes into account the work of the Senate, and then everything is still open. Or the executive and the majority seek an alibi to make sure it does not may not be any agreement. This is what would bring the rights of Parliament. “
At the exit of the reconciliation, the versions of each other diverged on the actual desire of each camp to reach an agreement. Even after the suspension of the work, the Senate Right and the President (LR) of the Palace of Luxembourg, Gérard Larcher, tried to convince the majority to resume reading the text in CMP. Categorical refusal of M me Braun-Pivet and MPs the Republic on the move (LRM). Impossible, even constitutionally, according to Jean-Pierre Sueur.
You still have 71.17% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.