Judgment in the Paris court for “individual terrorist company”, this 38-year-old security officer had for model the killer of Christchurch mosques in Australia. He denied on Thursday, having intended to take action.
by
The trial of Aurélien Hat, radical activist of the anti-Semitic and supregist ultradroite, judged in the Paris court for “individual terrorist company”, continued, Thursday, January 27. The same day as the International Day dedicated to the memory of the victims of the Holocaust. There was never mention of this annual commemoration at the hearing. And yet, there would have been there.
The obsessive anti-Semitic hatred of the Jews of Aurélien Hat, 38, has occupied a good part of the hearing. The day before, the Tribunal had examined Internet-based compulsive research – on the Jews, the Freemasons, the Grand Replacement, the iii e reich, etc. – from this training cook who has spent seven years in the army and working since 2011 as an agent for a security company.
From 2018, even though it is in the Collimator of Justice for dead threats against a Limousin and Police Sos-Racism Manager, and that a search at home Updated illegally acquired weapons, Aurélian hat continues to radicalize. Ad Naifeam. It subscribes to White Wolf and Zyklon B on Telegram Messaging, downloads the Great Replacement five times, the Tarrant Brendon Manifesto, the Australian terrorist who killed 51 people in two mosques of Christchurch on March 15, 2019.
Even more worrying, his Google searches are more concrete in 2019 and 2020: “Killing Limoges Jews”, “poison a water table”. In January 2020, he posts a series of seven photos of buildings belonging to Jewish institutions accompanied by their address: a school in Montrouge, cultural and cultural centers in Strasbourg, Clermond-Ferrand, Limoges, Neuilly. “I did a random search on Google Maps. It was to make the buzz. I erased them twenty-four hours later. That’s what I want it the most (…) I’m Am said it was too far. It’s too unhealthy. “” I deserve to be sanctioned, if only for school, “he says. Then he adds: “If people want to go to Jewish places, they do not need me.”
“I’m not going to apologize every two minutes”
For him, this internet search does not match a “identification”. This is not the opinion of the public prosecutor. The judge tries to explain that “the individual terrorist company” does not designate an “attempt” but a “purpose”, a trajectory. Aurélien Hat has trouble understanding.
You have 61.12% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.