Scientists compared the protection of natural and artificial immunity from coronavirus. Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor School Biology School Biology University of George Mason (Virginia, USA), Chief Researcher of the Laboratory of Functional Genomics of the Medical Genetic Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ancha Baranova in a conversation with RBC noted that the natural protection of the body after the disease is stronger than what appears from vaccinations However, the best option is vaccination after the suffering disease.
“No one may argue that he is healthy and young, which means it is not afraid to pass. This is a very dangerous lottery. The vaccination is much more” calm “option. It is necessary that people do not think that it is necessary to pass – the best alternative”, – Specified biologist.
Head of the laboratory of specially dangerous infections of the Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translation Medicine, Professor Virology Alexander Chepurnov agreed with the opinion that natural immunity works better. He noted that even one-time vaccination after the disease gives greater protection than both doses without infection. It is a combination of natural and vaccination immunity called “superimmunication”.
Director of the Global Virological Network Center and the WHO Advisor Konstantin Chumakov expressed disagreement with the fact that the natural immunity is better than artificial and stressed that after the transferred coronavirus should be vaccinated.
Earlier, the head of the center of epidemiology and microbiology named after Gamalei Alexander Ginzburg called the method of 100% protection against the Omicron strain of coronavirus. In his opinion, those who were given a “satellite V” and re-vaccinated with a booster preparation, almost completely protected from Oomikron.