Constraint to comply with the 35-hour law, the municipality had elaborated a new device. But the state, which saw a rupture of equity with the other public officials, had brought the case before the administrative court.
Le Monde with AFP
A judge of the referred to the State in front of the Socialist Mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, on some of his amenities of the working time of the agents of the capital, planned to enter into force at the ER January 2022.
At the request of the Prefect of the Ile-de-France Region, the Paris Administrative Tribunal suspended two provisions of the new regulation of the working time of the staff of the City of Paris, who work, according to the Court of Auditors , 1,552 annual hours instead of the 1,607 wanted by the law of August 6, 2019 for the transformation of the public service. By putting an end to the derogatory situations, this law imposes the 35 weekly hours to public officials.
The drafting of the targeted regulations had been negotiated with the unions, which feared the loss of eight days of annual leave. In the spring, agents of cleanliness had invaded the Town Hall to the CGT call, as well as the Town Hall of 13 e district.
The two disputed points are the entry into force of the Regulation in the first half of 2022 for certain agents, or even at the same time in September, as well as a principle of “Specific hardship” related to working in the capital, synonym of three days of additional RTT.
Paris calls
The magistrate considers that there is “serious doubt about the legality” of the two measures, which “will not enter into force on the 1 ” with the regulation, then that the judgment at the bottom must intervene by the end of the first quarter 2022.
In a statement published on Tuesday night, the city announces to appeal this “first decision”, which is “by no means a judgment at the bottom”, stressing that “the rest of the regulation” adopted in July “is not Contested “.
In disagreement with this law, which according to her an “increase in working time” ranging “reversing social progress” and calls into question “the autonomy of local public employers”, the city of Paris sought to By limiting the impact by this by-law to “protective and progress for its agents” measures, “she insists.