Many of the members of this proceeding regret the lack of reaction from the Federation of Parents’ Federation, after the controversial comments of the sociologist on VACCINATION against CVIV-19.
Did the first French parent federation of parents were slow to respond, after the controversial positions of sociologist Laurent Mucchielli on the “adverse effects” vaccines? While the CNRS recalled to order its researcher at the end of August, prayed as his confreres not to speak on subjects “remote from [their] competence”, the Directorate of the Federation of the Councils of Parents. “Students (CIPF) is, she remained silent, although this specialist in issues of delinquency and security leads his scientific council. An attitude that has just brought several members of this proceeding to resign.
It was in June 2016 that CIPF has a scientific council with recognized teachers and researchers, education specialists. Among them, the Sociologist Annabelle Allouch, the psychologist Jean-Yves Rochex, or the historian Laurence de Cock. This board orders and verifies notes produced by researchers, in an approach of “popularization” of school-based studies, for parents of students.
This advice is, in fact, considered a “dormant cell” by some of its members, who assure the world not attending a meeting for more than two years. But this instance is always officially presided over by Laurent Mucchielli.
Alerts during the summer
The question of its presence at the head of the CIPF Scientific Council emerged on October 5th on Twitter, pushing many of its members to position themselves. According to our information, at least four of them had sent their letter of resignation at CIPF Wednesday, October 6th at midday. “I have not participated for two years”, thus ensures Laurence of Cock, who “endorsed a fact of facts by resigning”. She added to her letter addressed to the president of the CIPF and the whole scientific council, that the position of Laurent Mucchielli on the vaccine also justified this decision.
At least two of the resigning members had taken care “to alert” the CIPF on the positions of Laurent Mucchielli during the summer, by Texto and by e-mail, without getting “a lot of reactions”. One of them had worried, in an email that Le Monde could consult, “harmful” effects of the words of Mr. Mucchielli who could, “by Ricochet”, touch the CIPF.
The instance asserts that it spoke “in Visio” with the sociologist to ask him to explain. “Following this, we reaffirmed it that CIPF did not share its positions,” says Carla Dugault, co-chair of the Federation, which adds that CIPF “never asked Laurent Mucchielli to produce work. relating to the Pandemic of Covid-19, a subject that is not in his field of expertise.
You have 30.09% of this article to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.